The Law and Assistive Technology
Public Law
President Bill Clinton signed the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act Amendments of 1997 on June 4, 1997 before a bipartisan
crowd of supporters on the White House South Lawn. The Act strengthens
academic expectations and accountability for the nation's 5.8 million
children with disabilities and bridges the gap that has too often
existed between what children with disabilities learn and what is
required in regular curriculum. The Amendments, also known as Public
Law 105-17, authorizes a range of studies to identify successful
practices and evaluate implementation of the Act. The Law identifies
four priorities for national training activities (low-incidence
disabilities,leadership development, projects of national significance,
and high-incidence disabilities). Austin has been selected to pilot
the ATSTAR Project as a model that may be implemented in school
districts, localities and states around the nation once its effectiveness
has been measured and evaluated.
P.L. 105-17 has six programs:
- State Improvement Grants
- Research and Innovation
- Personnel Preparation
- Studies and Evaluations
- Coordinated Technical Assistance/Information Dissemination[including
parent training]
- Technology Development, Demonstration, and Utilization/Educational
Media Services

It includes a national assessment and other studies designed to
determine the effectiveness of State and local efforts. Further,
it authorizes programs to assist States, partitioned into State
Education Areas(SEAs), in partnership with governors and Local Education
Areas(LEAs). The Federal guidelines are that 75% of grant must be
for professional development. The percentage may drop to 50% if
a State can demonstrate it has a sufficient supply of all types
of personnel. The Amendment authorizes a range of studies to identify
successful practices and evaluate implementation of the Act. 
P.L. 105-17 includes parent training and information centers, information
dissemination vehicles like clearinghouses and resource centers,
and technical assistance to build the capacity of State and local
programs. It also legalizes a range of technology development activities
funded by the Federal government through the States. Educational
media activities are authorized through 9/30/2001. After that date,
these activities are limited to educational, news, and information
materials.
http://www.house.gov/ed_workforce/hottopics/idea/ideasumchart.htm
http://www.ed.gov/offices/OSERS/IDEA/overview.html
Overview
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) has a long
history. It was first implemented in 1975, because before its implementation,
approximately 1 million children with disabilities were shut out
of schools and hundreds of thousands more were denied appropriate
services. Fortunately, things have changed. The legislation changed
the lives of many differently disabled children. Many are learning
and achieving at levels previously thought impossible. Because of
the progress made and opportunities now available, they are now
graduating from high school, going to college and entering the workforce
as productive citizens in unprecedented numbers.
Discouragingly, ninety percent of children with developmental disabilities
were previously housed in state institutions. Today, they are no
longer forced to live in those settings. As compared to their predecessors,
three times the number of young people with disabilities are enrolled
in colleges or universities, and twice as many of today's twenty
year olds with disabilities are working. But more must be done!
The status of children with disabilities still falls short of our
expectations for them. Currently, twice as many children with disabilities
drop out of school. Because they dropped out, they do not return
to school, have difficulty finding jobs and may sometimes end up
in the criminal justice system. Girls who drop out of school often
become young unwed mothers at a much higher rate than their fully-abled
peers. Many children with disabilities are excluded from the curriculum
and assessments used with their non-disabled classmates, limiting
their possibilities of performing to higher standards of performance.
This is why assistive technologies are important. 
The new IDEA Amendment is an attempt to remedy these and other
problems that contribute to the barriers children with disabilities
face. IDEA will facilitate change by raising expectations for children
with disabilities. Parental involvement will be increased in the
education of their children. It will ensure that regular education
teachers are involved in planning and assessing children's progress.
Now, children with disabilities will be included in assessments,
performance goals, and reports to the public. The grants will support
quality professional development for all personnel who are involved
in educating children with disabilities.
Over the past four decades,IDEA research has provided special education,
practical answers to questions about how best to educate infants,toddlers,
children and youth with disabilities. These accomplishments resulted
in benefits for all U.S. citizens. Over 1 million children, many
of whom were placed in separate schools and institutions 25 years
ago, are now being educated in neighborhood schools, saving an average
of $10,000 per child per year. Nine percent more children with disabilities
graduated from high school classes between 1984 and 1992. Youth
served under IDEA are today employed twice as often as their predecessors,
older American with similar disabilities who were not served under
the law.
Nearly half of all young adults with disabilities have successfully
completed course-work in colleges and universities. Although less
than 1% of the annual expenditures to educate children with disabilities
is spent on research and development to improve practice, these
dollars have had exponential results. They support programs that
allow children with disabilities to become independent learners
and self-supporting adults. 
New knowledge has resulted in technologies that have enriched all
our lives. For example, the Kurtzweil Machine, originally developed
for taking written text and translating it into Braille and speech
was the forerunner of the fax machine. Captioning, an aid for the
deaf, has become a boon for older Americans with poor hearing and
for those who are learning to read and speak English. The Joint
Resolution that ultimately funded the ATSTAR PROGRAM, is presented
below. 
1997 Session Senate Joint Resolution 2
Relative to federal funding under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act.
SPONSORS: Sen. Rubens, Dist 5; Sen. Gordon, Dist
2; Sen. Squires, Dist 12; Sen. D. Wheeler, Dist 11; Sen. Patenaude,
Dist 7; Rep. Belvin, Hills 14; Rep. Hunt, Ches 10; Rep. F. Riley,
Hills 44; Rep. Thulander, Hills 6
Analysis:
This senate joint resolution urges Congress to either change the
special education laws or provide funding to the states to meet
requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Whereas, when the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
was passed, Congress promised to fund 40 percent of the costs of
special education;
Whereas, the single largest contributor to escalating property
taxes in New Hampshire during the past decade has been the unfunded
mandates under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act;
now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives
in General Court convened:
That Congress either change the special education laws or appropriate
the promised 40 percent of the funding for special education; and
That copies of this resolution, signed by the president of the senate
and the speaker of the house be forwarded by the house clerk to
the President of the United States, to the President of the United
States Senate, to the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives,
and to each member of the New Hampshire Congressional delegation.
http://www.state.nh.us/gencourt/bills/oldbills/97sbills/sjr2.htm

Political Will
The law makers are important to this program, because they could
see its success and make it mandatory nationwide for students and
people with disabilities.
Federal Law mandates that students with disabilities be educated
within the least restrictive environment. As a result, educators
are expected to accommodate the more diverse learning strategies
of students with disabilities. Fortunately, Assistive Technologies
(AT) are available which create unprecedented opportunities to effectively
meet the educational needs of these students. Studies have shown
that AT can significantly improve the educational, vocational, and
social performance of students with disabilities and can affect
educational placement decisions as well. The National Rehabilitation
Information Center provides data from the Assistive Technology Projects
for several states, including Missouri, North Carolina, and the
Iowa Area Education Agencies (AEAs). In Iowa, a set of model policies
and procedures for AEAs was developed "to enhance the provision
of Assistive Technology services for students with disabilities."
This model lists staff development as the first of several key components,
necessary to ensure that each student receives an appropriate education."
Even so, the reality in most public schools is that teachers are
not trained to identify applications for Assistive Technology within
educational programming. According to database records kept by AISD.
Policy Makers
There are 8 Partners and an Advisory Board:
Austin ISD
Austin Community College
University of Texas
Austin Harvard School
Mountain Shadows Academy
Education Service Center, Region XIII
Far South Community Schools
Sylvan Learning Centers
Members of the Advisory Board Include the following:
Carye Abete, Austin ISD
James Albright, Austin Community College
Ron Ayer, Parent Volunteer & Employee of the Governor's Grants Team
Kim Belknap, Austin Harvard School
Ron Brey, Austin Community College
Becky Burnett, Region XIII
Mike Gerhardt, University of Texas
Diane Gustafson, Austin ISD
Henry McMahon, Special Education Parent Adivisory Board, AISD
Jan McSorley, Austin ISD
Julie Miller, Austin, ISD
Beverly Rodgers, Texas Center for Educational Technology
Sharron Rush, Knowbility
Piret Sari-Tate, Austin ISD
Sherry Schnizlein, Mountain Shadows Academy
Heather Watson, Sylvan Learning Centers of Austin
|